mirror of
https://github.com/iftas-org/lote.git
synced 2025-07-03 23:31:18 +03:00
Jaz-Michael King
GitHub
commit
07e47cfe68
31 changed files with 211 additions and 648 deletions
|
|
@ -1,36 +1,13 @@
|
|||
# Introduction
|
||||
As the Trust and Safety field grows — in significance, complexity, and
|
||||
number of practitioners — there is a corresponding value to ensuring a
|
||||
common understanding exists of key terms used by the people who work
|
||||
to keep users of digital services safe. Although companies have long used
|
||||
combinations of people, processes, and technology to address content- and
|
||||
conduct-related risks, this field, following the trajectory of other technology
|
||||
specializations like cybersecurity and privacy, has reached a critical point
|
||||
where it has begun to formalize, mature, and achieve self-awareness.
|
||||
Important discussions are happening all around the world, in homes, schools,
|
||||
businesses, and at all levels of government, about what Trust and Safety
|
||||
should look like to best serve societies and their evolving relationships to the
|
||||
internet. But meaningful discussion has at times been limited by the lack of a
|
||||
shared vocabulary.
|
||||
As the Trust and Safety field grows — in significance, complexity, and number of practitioners — there is a corresponding value to ensuring a common understanding exists of key terms used by the people who work to keep users of digital services safe.
|
||||
|
||||
Over the past year, the Digital Trust & Safety Partnership (DTSP) has been
|
||||
working to develop the first industry glossary of Trust and Safety terms.
|
||||
Following a public consultation, in which DTSP received valuable input from
|
||||
stakeholders including academic organizations, industry partners, regulators,
|
||||
and others from around the world, we are releasing the first edition of the
|
||||
glossary.
|
||||
Although companies have long use combinations of people, processes, and technology to address content- and conduct-related risks, this field, following the trajectory of other technology specializations like cybersecurity and privacy, has reached a critical point where it has begun to formalize, mature, and achieve self-awareness Important discussions are happening all around the world, in homes, schools businesses, and at all levels of government, about what Trust and Safet should look like to best serve societies and their evolving relationships to the internet. But meaningful discussion has at times been limited by the lack of shared vocabulary.
|
||||
|
||||
Led by DTSP co-founder Alex Feerst, this glossary has the following
|
||||
objectives:
|
||||
Over the past year, the Digital Trust & Safety Partnership (DTSP) has bee working to develop the first industry glossary of Trust and Safety terms Following a public consultation, in which DTSP received valuable input fro stakeholders including academic organizations, industry partners, regulators and others from around the world, we are releasing the first edition of th glossary
|
||||
Led by DTSP co-founder Alex Feerst, this glossary has the following objectives
|
||||
|
||||
1. Aid the professionalization of the field and support nascent Trust and
|
||||
Safety teams as they build out their operations;
|
||||
2. Support the adoption of agreed interpretations of critical terms used
|
||||
across the industry; and
|
||||
3. Facilitate informed dialogue between industry, policymakers, regulators,
|
||||
and the wider public.
|
||||
1. Aid the professionalization of the field and support nascent Trust and Safety teams as they build out their operations
|
||||
2. Support the adoption of agreed interpretations of critical terms use across the industry; and
|
||||
3. Facilitate informed dialogue between industry, policymakers, regulators and the wider public
|
||||
|
||||
The goal for this first edition has been to describe how key terms are used by
|
||||
practitioners in industry. These are not legal definitions, and their publication
|
||||
does not imply that every DTSP partner company fully agrees with every term
|
||||
as defined here.
|
||||
The goal for this first edition has been to describe how key terms are used by practitioners in industry. These are not legal definitions, and their publication does not imply that every DTSP partner company fully agrees with every term as defined here.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,36 +1,13 @@
|
|||
# Introduction
|
||||
As the Trust and Safety field grows — in significance, complexity, and
|
||||
number of practitioners — there is a corresponding value to ensuring a
|
||||
common understanding exists of key terms used by the people who work
|
||||
to keep users of digital services safe. Although companies have long used
|
||||
combinations of people, processes, and technology to address content- and
|
||||
conduct-related risks, this field, following the trajectory of other technology
|
||||
specializations like cybersecurity and privacy, has reached a critical point
|
||||
where it has begun to formalize, mature, and achieve self-awareness.
|
||||
Important discussions are happening all around the world, in homes, schools,
|
||||
businesses, and at all levels of government, about what Trust and Safety
|
||||
should look like to best serve societies and their evolving relationships to the
|
||||
internet. But meaningful discussion has at times been limited by the lack of a
|
||||
shared vocabulary.
|
||||
As the Trust and Safety field grows — in significance, complexity, and number of practitioners — there is a corresponding value to ensuring a common understanding exists of key terms used by the people who work to keep users of digital services safe.
|
||||
|
||||
Over the past year, the Digital Trust & Safety Partnership (DTSP) has been
|
||||
working to develop the first industry glossary of Trust and Safety terms.
|
||||
Following a public consultation, in which DTSP received valuable input from
|
||||
stakeholders including academic organizations, industry partners, regulators,
|
||||
and others from around the world, we are releasing the first edition of the
|
||||
glossary.
|
||||
Although companies have long use combinations of people, processes, and technology to address content- and conduct-related risks, this field, following the trajectory of other technology specializations like cybersecurity and privacy, has reached a critical point where it has begun to formalize, mature, and achieve self-awareness Important discussions are happening all around the world, in homes, schools businesses, and at all levels of government, about what Trust and Safet should look like to best serve societies and their evolving relationships to the internet. But meaningful discussion has at times been limited by the lack of shared vocabulary.
|
||||
|
||||
Led by DTSP co-founder Alex Feerst, this glossary has the following
|
||||
objectives:
|
||||
Over the past year, the Digital Trust & Safety Partnership (DTSP) has bee working to develop the first industry glossary of Trust and Safety terms Following a public consultation, in which DTSP received valuable input fro stakeholders including academic organizations, industry partners, regulators and others from around the world, we are releasing the first edition of th glossary
|
||||
Led by DTSP co-founder Alex Feerst, this glossary has the following objectives
|
||||
|
||||
1. Aid the professionalization of the field and support nascent Trust and
|
||||
Safety teams as they build out their operations;
|
||||
2. Support the adoption of agreed interpretations of critical terms used
|
||||
across the industry; and
|
||||
3. Facilitate informed dialogue between industry, policymakers, regulators,
|
||||
and the wider public.
|
||||
1. Aid the professionalization of the field and support nascent Trust and Safety teams as they build out their operations
|
||||
2. Support the adoption of agreed interpretations of critical terms use across the industry; and
|
||||
3. Facilitate informed dialogue between industry, policymakers, regulators and the wider public
|
||||
|
||||
The goal for this first edition has been to describe how key terms are used by
|
||||
practitioners in industry. These are not legal definitions, and their publication
|
||||
does not imply that every DTSP partner company fully agrees with every term
|
||||
as defined here.
|
||||
The goal for this first edition has been to describe how key terms are used by practitioners in industry. These are not legal definitions, and their publication does not imply that every DTSP partner company fully agrees with every term as defined here.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,36 +1,13 @@
|
|||
# Introduction
|
||||
As the Trust and Safety field grows — in significance, complexity, and
|
||||
number of practitioners — there is a corresponding value to ensuring a
|
||||
common understanding exists of key terms used by the people who work
|
||||
to keep users of digital services safe. Although companies have long used
|
||||
combinations of people, processes, and technology to address content- and
|
||||
conduct-related risks, this field, following the trajectory of other technology
|
||||
specializations like cybersecurity and privacy, has reached a critical point
|
||||
where it has begun to formalize, mature, and achieve self-awareness.
|
||||
Important discussions are happening all around the world, in homes, schools,
|
||||
businesses, and at all levels of government, about what Trust and Safety
|
||||
should look like to best serve societies and their evolving relationships to the
|
||||
internet. But meaningful discussion has at times been limited by the lack of a
|
||||
shared vocabulary.
|
||||
As the Trust and Safety field grows — in significance, complexity, and number of practitioners — there is a corresponding value to ensuring a common understanding exists of key terms used by the people who work to keep users of digital services safe.
|
||||
|
||||
Over the past year, the Digital Trust & Safety Partnership (DTSP) has been
|
||||
working to develop the first industry glossary of Trust and Safety terms.
|
||||
Following a public consultation, in which DTSP received valuable input from
|
||||
stakeholders including academic organizations, industry partners, regulators,
|
||||
and others from around the world, we are releasing the first edition of the
|
||||
glossary.
|
||||
Although companies have long use combinations of people, processes, and technology to address content- and conduct-related risks, this field, following the trajectory of other technology specializations like cybersecurity and privacy, has reached a critical point where it has begun to formalize, mature, and achieve self-awareness Important discussions are happening all around the world, in homes, schools businesses, and at all levels of government, about what Trust and Safet should look like to best serve societies and their evolving relationships to the internet. But meaningful discussion has at times been limited by the lack of shared vocabulary.
|
||||
|
||||
Led by DTSP co-founder Alex Feerst, this glossary has the following
|
||||
objectives:
|
||||
Over the past year, the Digital Trust & Safety Partnership (DTSP) has bee working to develop the first industry glossary of Trust and Safety terms Following a public consultation, in which DTSP received valuable input fro stakeholders including academic organizations, industry partners, regulators and others from around the world, we are releasing the first edition of th glossary
|
||||
Led by DTSP co-founder Alex Feerst, this glossary has the following objectives
|
||||
|
||||
1. Aid the professionalization of the field and support nascent Trust and
|
||||
Safety teams as they build out their operations;
|
||||
2. Support the adoption of agreed interpretations of critical terms used
|
||||
across the industry; and
|
||||
3. Facilitate informed dialogue between industry, policymakers, regulators,
|
||||
and the wider public.
|
||||
1. Aid the professionalization of the field and support nascent Trust and Safety teams as they build out their operations
|
||||
2. Support the adoption of agreed interpretations of critical terms use across the industry; and
|
||||
3. Facilitate informed dialogue between industry, policymakers, regulators and the wider public
|
||||
|
||||
The goal for this first edition has been to describe how key terms are used by
|
||||
practitioners in industry. These are not legal definitions, and their publication
|
||||
does not imply that every DTSP partner company fully agrees with every term
|
||||
as defined here.
|
||||
The goal for this first edition has been to describe how key terms are used by practitioners in industry. These are not legal definitions, and their publication does not imply that every DTSP partner company fully agrees with every term as defined here.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,36 +1,13 @@
|
|||
# Introduction
|
||||
As the Trust and Safety field grows — in significance, complexity, and
|
||||
number of practitioners — there is a corresponding value to ensuring a
|
||||
common understanding exists of key terms used by the people who work
|
||||
to keep users of digital services safe. Although companies have long used
|
||||
combinations of people, processes, and technology to address content- and
|
||||
conduct-related risks, this field, following the trajectory of other technology
|
||||
specializations like cybersecurity and privacy, has reached a critical point
|
||||
where it has begun to formalize, mature, and achieve self-awareness.
|
||||
Important discussions are happening all around the world, in homes, schools,
|
||||
businesses, and at all levels of government, about what Trust and Safety
|
||||
should look like to best serve societies and their evolving relationships to the
|
||||
internet. But meaningful discussion has at times been limited by the lack of a
|
||||
shared vocabulary.
|
||||
As the Trust and Safety field grows — in significance, complexity, and number of practitioners — there is a corresponding value to ensuring a common understanding exists of key terms used by the people who work to keep users of digital services safe.
|
||||
|
||||
Over the past year, the Digital Trust & Safety Partnership (DTSP) has been
|
||||
working to develop the first industry glossary of Trust and Safety terms.
|
||||
Following a public consultation, in which DTSP received valuable input from
|
||||
stakeholders including academic organizations, industry partners, regulators,
|
||||
and others from around the world, we are releasing the first edition of the
|
||||
glossary.
|
||||
Although companies have long use combinations of people, processes, and technology to address content- and conduct-related risks, this field, following the trajectory of other technology specializations like cybersecurity and privacy, has reached a critical point where it has begun to formalize, mature, and achieve self-awareness Important discussions are happening all around the world, in homes, schools businesses, and at all levels of government, about what Trust and Safet should look like to best serve societies and their evolving relationships to the internet. But meaningful discussion has at times been limited by the lack of shared vocabulary.
|
||||
|
||||
Led by DTSP co-founder Alex Feerst, this glossary has the following
|
||||
objectives:
|
||||
Over the past year, the Digital Trust & Safety Partnership (DTSP) has bee working to develop the first industry glossary of Trust and Safety terms Following a public consultation, in which DTSP received valuable input fro stakeholders including academic organizations, industry partners, regulators and others from around the world, we are releasing the first edition of th glossary
|
||||
Led by DTSP co-founder Alex Feerst, this glossary has the following objectives
|
||||
|
||||
1. Aid the professionalization of the field and support nascent Trust and
|
||||
Safety teams as they build out their operations;
|
||||
2. Support the adoption of agreed interpretations of critical terms used
|
||||
across the industry; and
|
||||
3. Facilitate informed dialogue between industry, policymakers, regulators,
|
||||
and the wider public.
|
||||
1. Aid the professionalization of the field and support nascent Trust and Safety teams as they build out their operations
|
||||
2. Support the adoption of agreed interpretations of critical terms use across the industry; and
|
||||
3. Facilitate informed dialogue between industry, policymakers, regulators and the wider public
|
||||
|
||||
The goal for this first edition has been to describe how key terms are used by
|
||||
practitioners in industry. These are not legal definitions, and their publication
|
||||
does not imply that every DTSP partner company fully agrees with every term
|
||||
as defined here.
|
||||
The goal for this first edition has been to describe how key terms are used by practitioners in industry. These are not legal definitions, and their publication does not imply that every DTSP partner company fully agrees with every term as defined here.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,36 +1,13 @@
|
|||
# Introduction
|
||||
As the Trust and Safety field grows — in significance, complexity, and
|
||||
number of practitioners — there is a corresponding value to ensuring a
|
||||
common understanding exists of key terms used by the people who work
|
||||
to keep users of digital services safe. Although companies have long used
|
||||
combinations of people, processes, and technology to address content- and
|
||||
conduct-related risks, this field, following the trajectory of other technology
|
||||
specializations like cybersecurity and privacy, has reached a critical point
|
||||
where it has begun to formalize, mature, and achieve self-awareness.
|
||||
Important discussions are happening all around the world, in homes, schools,
|
||||
businesses, and at all levels of government, about what Trust and Safety
|
||||
should look like to best serve societies and their evolving relationships to the
|
||||
internet. But meaningful discussion has at times been limited by the lack of a
|
||||
shared vocabulary.
|
||||
As the Trust and Safety field grows — in significance, complexity, and number of practitioners — there is a corresponding value to ensuring a common understanding exists of key terms used by the people who work to keep users of digital services safe.
|
||||
|
||||
Over the past year, the Digital Trust & Safety Partnership (DTSP) has been
|
||||
working to develop the first industry glossary of Trust and Safety terms.
|
||||
Following a public consultation, in which DTSP received valuable input from
|
||||
stakeholders including academic organizations, industry partners, regulators,
|
||||
and others from around the world, we are releasing the first edition of the
|
||||
glossary.
|
||||
Although companies have long use combinations of people, processes, and technology to address content- and conduct-related risks, this field, following the trajectory of other technology specializations like cybersecurity and privacy, has reached a critical point where it has begun to formalize, mature, and achieve self-awareness Important discussions are happening all around the world, in homes, schools businesses, and at all levels of government, about what Trust and Safet should look like to best serve societies and their evolving relationships to the internet. But meaningful discussion has at times been limited by the lack of shared vocabulary.
|
||||
|
||||
Led by DTSP co-founder Alex Feerst, this glossary has the following
|
||||
objectives:
|
||||
Over the past year, the Digital Trust & Safety Partnership (DTSP) has bee working to develop the first industry glossary of Trust and Safety terms Following a public consultation, in which DTSP received valuable input fro stakeholders including academic organizations, industry partners, regulators and others from around the world, we are releasing the first edition of th glossary
|
||||
Led by DTSP co-founder Alex Feerst, this glossary has the following objectives
|
||||
|
||||
1. Aid the professionalization of the field and support nascent Trust and
|
||||
Safety teams as they build out their operations;
|
||||
2. Support the adoption of agreed interpretations of critical terms used
|
||||
across the industry; and
|
||||
3. Facilitate informed dialogue between industry, policymakers, regulators,
|
||||
and the wider public.
|
||||
1. Aid the professionalization of the field and support nascent Trust and Safety teams as they build out their operations
|
||||
2. Support the adoption of agreed interpretations of critical terms use across the industry; and
|
||||
3. Facilitate informed dialogue between industry, policymakers, regulators and the wider public
|
||||
|
||||
The goal for this first edition has been to describe how key terms are used by
|
||||
practitioners in industry. These are not legal definitions, and their publication
|
||||
does not imply that every DTSP partner company fully agrees with every term
|
||||
as defined here.
|
||||
The goal for this first edition has been to describe how key terms are used by practitioners in industry. These are not legal definitions, and their publication does not imply that every DTSP partner company fully agrees with every term as defined here.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
|
|||
Account Takeover
|
||||
Reprise de Compte
|
||||
|
||||
Scénario dans lequel une personne non autorisée prend le contrôle d'un compte d'utilisateur, par des moyens tels que le piratage, l'hameçonnage ou l'achat de données d'identification fuitées.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -4,6 +4,6 @@ Le CSAM (« Child Sexual Abuse Material ») est du contenu (images ou vidéos)
|
|||
|
||||
Le terme « Imagerie simulée d'exploitation sexuelle et abus de mineurs » (Simulated Child Sexual Exploitation and Abuse Imagery) recouvre toute représentation de mineur, fictive ou modifiée, à caractère pornographique, sans la participation directe d'un mineur.
|
||||
|
||||
Experts, survivor groups, and the industry discourage the use of the term “Child Pornography,” which is still used as a legal term in multiple jurisdictions and international treaties.
|
||||
Les experts, les groupes de survivants et les professionnels découragent l'utilisation des termes « pornographie juvénile » ou « pornographie infantile », encore utilisés dans de multiples juridictions et traités internationaux.
|
||||
|
||||
Le CSAM est illégal dans presque toutes les juridictions, ce qui fait de sa détection et de sa suppression une priorité élevée pour les services en ligne.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
|
|||
Disinformation
|
||||
Désinformation
|
||||
|
||||
False information that is spread intentionally and maliciously to create confusion, encourage distrust, and potentially undermine political and social institutions.
|
||||
C'est la diffusion délibérée et mal-intentionnée de fausses informations, dans le but de créer de la confusion, d'engendrer de la méfiance et potentiellement de saper les institutions politiques et sociales.
|
||||
|
||||
Mal-information is another category of misleading information identified by researchers, information that is based on reality but is used to inflict harm on a person, organization or country by changing the context in which the information is presented.
|
||||
Les chercheurs distinguent une autre catégorie d'information trompeuse, l'information malveillante. Elle est basée sur la réalité mais le contexte dans lequel elle est présentée est modifié, afin de nuire à une personne, à une organisation ou à un pays.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
|||
Doxxing
|
||||
Doxing
|
||||
|
||||
The act of disclosing someone’s personal, non-public information — such as a real name, home address, phone number or any other data that could be used to identify the individual — in an online forum or other public place without the person’s consent.
|
||||
L'acte de divulguer les informations privées d'une personne — comme son vrai nom, son adresse, son numéro de téléphone ou toute autre donnée qui pourrait permettre de l'identifier — dans un forum en ligne ou tout autre espace public, sans le consentement de la personne.
|
||||
|
||||
Doxxing may lead to real world threats against the person whose information has been exposed, and for this reason it is often considered a form of online harassment.
|
||||
Le doxing peut mener à des menaces réelles contre la personne dont les informations ont été diffusées, et pour cette raison, il est souvent considéré comme une forme de cyberharcèlement.
|
||||
|
||||
Some services may also consider aggregating and disclosing publicly available information about a person in a menacing manner sufficient to constitute doxxing.
|
||||
Certains services en ligne peuvent considérer que l'agrégation et la divulgation d'informations publiques sur une personne, dans un contexte menaçant, sont suffisants pour pouvoir être qualifiés de doxing.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
|||
Farming
|
||||
Fermes de Contenus
|
||||
|
||||
Content farming involves creating online content for the sole or primary purpose of attracting page views and increasing advertising revenue, rather than out of a desire to express or communicate any particular message.
|
||||
Les fermes de contenus sont des sites créés dans le but principal et parfois unique d'attirer des vues et de générer des revenus publicitaires, plutôt que par désir de diffuser un contenu en particulier.
|
||||
|
||||
Content farms often create web content based on popular user search queries (a practice known as "search engine optimization") in order to rank more highly in search engine results. The resulting "cultivated" content is generally low-quality or spammy, but can still be profitable because of the strategic use of specific keywords to manipulate search engine algorithms and lead users to navigate to a page, allowing the owner to "harvest clicks" for ad revenue.
|
||||
Ces fermes de contenu créent souvent leur contenu selon les requêtes de recherche les plus populaires (une pratique connue sous le nom d'« optimisation des moteurs de recherche ») afin de se classer plus haut dans les résultats des moteurs de recherche. Le contenu de ces sites est généralement de faible qualité, voire du spam, mais peut toutefois être rentable en raison de l'utilisation stratégique de certains mots clés pour manipuler les algorithmes des moteurs de recherche et conduire les utilisateurs à naviguer sur une page, permettant ainsi de « récolter des clics » pour les revenus publicitaires.
|
||||
|
||||
Account farming involves creating and initially using accounts on services in apparently innocuous ways in order to build followers, age the account, and create a record, making the account appear authentic and credible, before later redirecting the account to post spam, disinformation, or other abusive content or selling it to those who intend to do so.
|
||||
Les fermes de contenus commencent généralement par créer des comptes sur des services en ligne, comptes qu'elles utilisent initialement de manière apparemment inoffensive afin de se construire une base d'abonnés, de laisser vieillir le compte, et de créer un historique, tout cela afin que le compte paraisse authentique et crédible, avant de l'utiliser pour poster du spam, de la désinformation ou tout autre contenu abusif, ou bien de le vendre à ceux qui vont l'exploiter à ces fins.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
|
|||
Glorification of Violence
|
||||
Glorification de la violence
|
||||
|
||||
Statements or images that celebrate past or hypothetical future acts of violence.
|
||||
Il s'agit de déclarations ou d'images qui célèbrent des actes de violence, du passé ou à venir.
|
||||
|
||||
Some online services restrict or prohibit glorification of violence (including terrorism) on the reasoning that it may incite or intensify future acts of violence and foster a menacing or unsafe online environment, though it is challenging to distinguish glorification of a subject from other types of discussion of it.
|
||||
Certains services en ligne restreignent ou interdisent la glorification de la violence (y compris le terrorisme) car ils considèrent qu'elle peut inciter à de futurs actes de violence ou à les intensifier, et qu'elle favorise un environnement en ligne menaçant ou dangereux. Mais il peut être difficile de déterminer ce qui constitue de la glorification dans la discussion d'un thème en particulier.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
|
|||
Hate Speech
|
||||
Discours de haine
|
||||
|
||||
Abusive, hateful, or threatening content or conduct that expresses prejudice against a group or a person due to membership in a group, which may be based on legally protected characteristics, such as religion, ethnicity, nationality, race, gender identification, sexual orientation, or other characteristics.
|
||||
Contenu ou comportement abusif, haineux ou menaçant qui exprime un préjugé à l'égard d'une personne ou d'un groupe en raison de leur appartenance à un groupe, qui se fonde sur des caractéristiques juridiquement protégées, telles que la religion, l'origine ethnique, la nationalité, la race, le genre, l'orientation sexuelle ou autres.
|
||||
|
||||
There is no international legal definition of hate speech.
|
||||
Il n'existe pas de définition juridique internationale du discours de haine.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
|
|||
Impersonation
|
||||
Usurpation d'identité
|
||||
|
||||
Online impersonation most often involves the creation of an account profile that uses someone else’s name, image, likeness or other characteristics without that person’s permission to create a false or misleading impression that the account is controlled by them.
|
||||
L’usurpation d’identité en ligne désigne généralement la création d’un faux profil qui utilise le nom, l’image, la ressemblance ou autres caractéristiques d'une autre personne sans son autorisation, afin de créer l'impression fausse ou trompeuse que le compte est contrôlé par elle.
|
||||
|
||||
Also known as "imposter accounts."
|
||||
Aussi connu sous le nom de « compte imposteur ».
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
|
|||
Incitement
|
||||
Incitation à la violence
|
||||
|
||||
To encourage violence or violent sentiment against a person or group.
|
||||
Cela consiste à pousser à la violence ou à la haine à l'égard d'une personne ou d'un groupe.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,36 +1,13 @@
|
|||
# Introduction
|
||||
As the Trust and Safety field grows — in significance, complexity, and
|
||||
number of practitioners — there is a corresponding value to ensuring a
|
||||
common understanding exists of key terms used by the people who work
|
||||
to keep users of digital services safe. Although companies have long used
|
||||
combinations of people, processes, and technology to address content- and
|
||||
conduct-related risks, this field, following the trajectory of other technology
|
||||
specializations like cybersecurity and privacy, has reached a critical point
|
||||
where it has begun to formalize, mature, and achieve self-awareness.
|
||||
Important discussions are happening all around the world, in homes, schools,
|
||||
businesses, and at all levels of government, about what Trust and Safety
|
||||
should look like to best serve societies and their evolving relationships to the
|
||||
internet. But meaningful discussion has at times been limited by the lack of a
|
||||
shared vocabulary.
|
||||
Au fur et à mesure que le domaine « Confiance et Sécurité » gagne en importance, en complexité, et en nombre d'affiliés — il devient de plus en plus important de s'assurer qu'il existe une compréhension commune des termes clés utilisés par les personnes qui veillent à la sécurité des utilisateurs des services numériques.
|
||||
|
||||
Over the past year, the Digital Trust & Safety Partnership (DTSP) has been
|
||||
working to develop the first industry glossary of Trust and Safety terms.
|
||||
Following a public consultation, in which DTSP received valuable input from
|
||||
stakeholders including academic organizations, industry partners, regulators,
|
||||
and others from around the world, we are releasing the first edition of the
|
||||
glossary.
|
||||
Les entreprises ont depuis longtemps recours à une combinaison de personnes, de procédés et de technologies pour traiter les risques liés aux contenus et aux comportements en ligne. Mais ce domaine, à l'instar d'autres spécialisations technologiques telles que la cybersécurité et la protection de la vie privée, atteint maintenant un point critique où il commence à se formaliser, à mûrir et à prendre conscience de lui-même. Des discussions importantes ont lieu partout dans le monde, dans les foyers, les centres éducatifs, les entreprises et à tous les niveaux de gouvernement, sur ce à quoi devrait ressembler les services de « Confiance et Sécurité » pour servir au mieux différentes sociétés et leur relation, en constante évolution, avec Internet. Mais le manque d'un lexique commun a parfois limité les discussions significatives.
|
||||
|
||||
Led by DTSP co-founder Alex Feerst, this glossary has the following
|
||||
objectives:
|
||||
Au cours de l'année écoulée, le Digital Trust & Safety Partnership (DTSP) a travaillé à rédiger le premier glossaire professionnel de la Modération en Ligne. Après une consultation publique, durant laquelle le DTSP a reçu de précieuses contributions de la part de différentes parties prenantes, dont des organisations universitaires, des partenaires de cette branche, des régulateurs et d'autres organismes du monde entier, nous publions la première édition de ce glossaire.
|
||||
Led by DTSP co-founder Alex Feerst, this glossary has the following objectives
|
||||
|
||||
1. Aid the professionalization of the field and support nascent Trust and
|
||||
Safety teams as they build out their operations;
|
||||
2. Support the adoption of agreed interpretations of critical terms used
|
||||
across the industry; and
|
||||
3. Facilitate informed dialogue between industry, policymakers, regulators,
|
||||
and the wider public.
|
||||
1. Aid the professionalization of the field and support nascent Trust and Safety teams as they build out their operations
|
||||
2. Support the adoption of agreed interpretations of critical terms use across the industry; and
|
||||
3. Facilitate informed dialogue between industry, policymakers, regulators and the wider public
|
||||
|
||||
The goal for this first edition has been to describe how key terms are used by
|
||||
practitioners in industry. These are not legal definitions, and their publication
|
||||
does not imply that every DTSP partner company fully agrees with every term
|
||||
as defined here.
|
||||
The goal for this first edition has been to describe how key terms are used by practitioners in industry. These are not legal definitions, and their publication does not imply that every DTSP partner company fully agrees with every term as defined here.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,36 +1,13 @@
|
|||
# Introduction
|
||||
As the Trust and Safety field grows — in significance, complexity, and
|
||||
number of practitioners — there is a corresponding value to ensuring a
|
||||
common understanding exists of key terms used by the people who work
|
||||
to keep users of digital services safe. Although companies have long used
|
||||
combinations of people, processes, and technology to address content- and
|
||||
conduct-related risks, this field, following the trajectory of other technology
|
||||
specializations like cybersecurity and privacy, has reached a critical point
|
||||
where it has begun to formalize, mature, and achieve self-awareness.
|
||||
Important discussions are happening all around the world, in homes, schools,
|
||||
businesses, and at all levels of government, about what Trust and Safety
|
||||
should look like to best serve societies and their evolving relationships to the
|
||||
internet. But meaningful discussion has at times been limited by the lack of a
|
||||
shared vocabulary.
|
||||
As the Trust and Safety field grows — in significance, complexity, and number of practitioners — there is a corresponding value to ensuring a common understanding exists of key terms used by the people who work to keep users of digital services safe.
|
||||
|
||||
Over the past year, the Digital Trust & Safety Partnership (DTSP) has been
|
||||
working to develop the first industry glossary of Trust and Safety terms.
|
||||
Following a public consultation, in which DTSP received valuable input from
|
||||
stakeholders including academic organizations, industry partners, regulators,
|
||||
and others from around the world, we are releasing the first edition of the
|
||||
glossary.
|
||||
Although companies have long use combinations of people, processes, and technology to address content- and conduct-related risks, this field, following the trajectory of other technology specializations like cybersecurity and privacy, has reached a critical point where it has begun to formalize, mature, and achieve self-awareness Important discussions are happening all around the world, in homes, schools businesses, and at all levels of government, about what Trust and Safet should look like to best serve societies and their evolving relationships to the internet. But meaningful discussion has at times been limited by the lack of shared vocabulary.
|
||||
|
||||
Led by DTSP co-founder Alex Feerst, this glossary has the following
|
||||
objectives:
|
||||
Over the past year, the Digital Trust & Safety Partnership (DTSP) has bee working to develop the first industry glossary of Trust and Safety terms Following a public consultation, in which DTSP received valuable input fro stakeholders including academic organizations, industry partners, regulators and others from around the world, we are releasing the first edition of th glossary
|
||||
Led by DTSP co-founder Alex Feerst, this glossary has the following objectives
|
||||
|
||||
1. Aid the professionalization of the field and support nascent Trust and
|
||||
Safety teams as they build out their operations;
|
||||
2. Support the adoption of agreed interpretations of critical terms used
|
||||
across the industry; and
|
||||
3. Facilitate informed dialogue between industry, policymakers, regulators,
|
||||
and the wider public.
|
||||
1. Aid the professionalization of the field and support nascent Trust and Safety teams as they build out their operations
|
||||
2. Support the adoption of agreed interpretations of critical terms use across the industry; and
|
||||
3. Facilitate informed dialogue between industry, policymakers, regulators and the wider public
|
||||
|
||||
The goal for this first edition has been to describe how key terms are used by
|
||||
practitioners in industry. These are not legal definitions, and their publication
|
||||
does not imply that every DTSP partner company fully agrees with every term
|
||||
as defined here.
|
||||
The goal for this first edition has been to describe how key terms are used by practitioners in industry. These are not legal definitions, and their publication does not imply that every DTSP partner company fully agrees with every term as defined here.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,36 +1,13 @@
|
|||
# Introduction
|
||||
As the Trust and Safety field grows — in significance, complexity, and
|
||||
number of practitioners — there is a corresponding value to ensuring a
|
||||
common understanding exists of key terms used by the people who work
|
||||
to keep users of digital services safe. Although companies have long used
|
||||
combinations of people, processes, and technology to address content- and
|
||||
conduct-related risks, this field, following the trajectory of other technology
|
||||
specializations like cybersecurity and privacy, has reached a critical point
|
||||
where it has begun to formalize, mature, and achieve self-awareness.
|
||||
Important discussions are happening all around the world, in homes, schools,
|
||||
businesses, and at all levels of government, about what Trust and Safety
|
||||
should look like to best serve societies and their evolving relationships to the
|
||||
internet. But meaningful discussion has at times been limited by the lack of a
|
||||
shared vocabulary.
|
||||
As the Trust and Safety field grows — in significance, complexity, and number of practitioners — there is a corresponding value to ensuring a common understanding exists of key terms used by the people who work to keep users of digital services safe.
|
||||
|
||||
Over the past year, the Digital Trust & Safety Partnership (DTSP) has been
|
||||
working to develop the first industry glossary of Trust and Safety terms.
|
||||
Following a public consultation, in which DTSP received valuable input from
|
||||
stakeholders including academic organizations, industry partners, regulators,
|
||||
and others from around the world, we are releasing the first edition of the
|
||||
glossary.
|
||||
Although companies have long use combinations of people, processes, and technology to address content- and conduct-related risks, this field, following the trajectory of other technology specializations like cybersecurity and privacy, has reached a critical point where it has begun to formalize, mature, and achieve self-awareness Important discussions are happening all around the world, in homes, schools businesses, and at all levels of government, about what Trust and Safet should look like to best serve societies and their evolving relationships to the internet. But meaningful discussion has at times been limited by the lack of shared vocabulary.
|
||||
|
||||
Led by DTSP co-founder Alex Feerst, this glossary has the following
|
||||
objectives:
|
||||
Over the past year, the Digital Trust & Safety Partnership (DTSP) has bee working to develop the first industry glossary of Trust and Safety terms Following a public consultation, in which DTSP received valuable input fro stakeholders including academic organizations, industry partners, regulators and others from around the world, we are releasing the first edition of th glossary
|
||||
Led by DTSP co-founder Alex Feerst, this glossary has the following objectives
|
||||
|
||||
1. Aid the professionalization of the field and support nascent Trust and
|
||||
Safety teams as they build out their operations;
|
||||
2. Support the adoption of agreed interpretations of critical terms used
|
||||
across the industry; and
|
||||
3. Facilitate informed dialogue between industry, policymakers, regulators,
|
||||
and the wider public.
|
||||
1. Aid the professionalization of the field and support nascent Trust and Safety teams as they build out their operations
|
||||
2. Support the adoption of agreed interpretations of critical terms use across the industry; and
|
||||
3. Facilitate informed dialogue between industry, policymakers, regulators and the wider public
|
||||
|
||||
The goal for this first edition has been to describe how key terms are used by
|
||||
practitioners in industry. These are not legal definitions, and their publication
|
||||
does not imply that every DTSP partner company fully agrees with every term
|
||||
as defined here.
|
||||
The goal for this first edition has been to describe how key terms are used by practitioners in industry. These are not legal definitions, and their publication does not imply that every DTSP partner company fully agrees with every term as defined here.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,36 +1,13 @@
|
|||
# Introduction
|
||||
As the Trust and Safety field grows — in significance, complexity, and
|
||||
number of practitioners — there is a corresponding value to ensuring a
|
||||
common understanding exists of key terms used by the people who work
|
||||
to keep users of digital services safe. Although companies have long used
|
||||
combinations of people, processes, and technology to address content- and
|
||||
conduct-related risks, this field, following the trajectory of other technology
|
||||
specializations like cybersecurity and privacy, has reached a critical point
|
||||
where it has begun to formalize, mature, and achieve self-awareness.
|
||||
Important discussions are happening all around the world, in homes, schools,
|
||||
businesses, and at all levels of government, about what Trust and Safety
|
||||
should look like to best serve societies and their evolving relationships to the
|
||||
internet. But meaningful discussion has at times been limited by the lack of a
|
||||
shared vocabulary.
|
||||
As the Trust and Safety field grows — in significance, complexity, and number of practitioners — there is a corresponding value to ensuring a common understanding exists of key terms used by the people who work to keep users of digital services safe.
|
||||
|
||||
Over the past year, the Digital Trust & Safety Partnership (DTSP) has been
|
||||
working to develop the first industry glossary of Trust and Safety terms.
|
||||
Following a public consultation, in which DTSP received valuable input from
|
||||
stakeholders including academic organizations, industry partners, regulators,
|
||||
and others from around the world, we are releasing the first edition of the
|
||||
glossary.
|
||||
Although companies have long use combinations of people, processes, and technology to address content- and conduct-related risks, this field, following the trajectory of other technology specializations like cybersecurity and privacy, has reached a critical point where it has begun to formalize, mature, and achieve self-awareness Important discussions are happening all around the world, in homes, schools businesses, and at all levels of government, about what Trust and Safet should look like to best serve societies and their evolving relationships to the internet. But meaningful discussion has at times been limited by the lack of shared vocabulary.
|
||||
|
||||
Led by DTSP co-founder Alex Feerst, this glossary has the following
|
||||
objectives:
|
||||
Over the past year, the Digital Trust & Safety Partnership (DTSP) has bee working to develop the first industry glossary of Trust and Safety terms Following a public consultation, in which DTSP received valuable input fro stakeholders including academic organizations, industry partners, regulators and others from around the world, we are releasing the first edition of th glossary
|
||||
Led by DTSP co-founder Alex Feerst, this glossary has the following objectives
|
||||
|
||||
1. Aid the professionalization of the field and support nascent Trust and
|
||||
Safety teams as they build out their operations;
|
||||
2. Support the adoption of agreed interpretations of critical terms used
|
||||
across the industry; and
|
||||
3. Facilitate informed dialogue between industry, policymakers, regulators,
|
||||
and the wider public.
|
||||
1. Aid the professionalization of the field and support nascent Trust and Safety teams as they build out their operations
|
||||
2. Support the adoption of agreed interpretations of critical terms use across the industry; and
|
||||
3. Facilitate informed dialogue between industry, policymakers, regulators and the wider public
|
||||
|
||||
The goal for this first edition has been to describe how key terms are used by
|
||||
practitioners in industry. These are not legal definitions, and their publication
|
||||
does not imply that every DTSP partner company fully agrees with every term
|
||||
as defined here.
|
||||
The goal for this first edition has been to describe how key terms are used by practitioners in industry. These are not legal definitions, and their publication does not imply that every DTSP partner company fully agrees with every term as defined here.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,36 +1,13 @@
|
|||
# Introduction
|
||||
As the Trust and Safety field grows — in significance, complexity, and
|
||||
number of practitioners — there is a corresponding value to ensuring a
|
||||
common understanding exists of key terms used by the people who work
|
||||
to keep users of digital services safe. Although companies have long used
|
||||
combinations of people, processes, and technology to address content- and
|
||||
conduct-related risks, this field, following the trajectory of other technology
|
||||
specializations like cybersecurity and privacy, has reached a critical point
|
||||
where it has begun to formalize, mature, and achieve self-awareness.
|
||||
Important discussions are happening all around the world, in homes, schools,
|
||||
businesses, and at all levels of government, about what Trust and Safety
|
||||
should look like to best serve societies and their evolving relationships to the
|
||||
internet. But meaningful discussion has at times been limited by the lack of a
|
||||
shared vocabulary.
|
||||
As the Trust and Safety field grows — in significance, complexity, and number of practitioners — there is a corresponding value to ensuring a common understanding exists of key terms used by the people who work to keep users of digital services safe.
|
||||
|
||||
Over the past year, the Digital Trust & Safety Partnership (DTSP) has been
|
||||
working to develop the first industry glossary of Trust and Safety terms.
|
||||
Following a public consultation, in which DTSP received valuable input from
|
||||
stakeholders including academic organizations, industry partners, regulators,
|
||||
and others from around the world, we are releasing the first edition of the
|
||||
glossary.
|
||||
Although companies have long use combinations of people, processes, and technology to address content- and conduct-related risks, this field, following the trajectory of other technology specializations like cybersecurity and privacy, has reached a critical point where it has begun to formalize, mature, and achieve self-awareness Important discussions are happening all around the world, in homes, schools businesses, and at all levels of government, about what Trust and Safet should look like to best serve societies and their evolving relationships to the internet. But meaningful discussion has at times been limited by the lack of shared vocabulary.
|
||||
|
||||
Led by DTSP co-founder Alex Feerst, this glossary has the following
|
||||
objectives:
|
||||
Over the past year, the Digital Trust & Safety Partnership (DTSP) has bee working to develop the first industry glossary of Trust and Safety terms Following a public consultation, in which DTSP received valuable input fro stakeholders including academic organizations, industry partners, regulators and others from around the world, we are releasing the first edition of th glossary
|
||||
Led by DTSP co-founder Alex Feerst, this glossary has the following objectives
|
||||
|
||||
1. Aid the professionalization of the field and support nascent Trust and
|
||||
Safety teams as they build out their operations;
|
||||
2. Support the adoption of agreed interpretations of critical terms used
|
||||
across the industry; and
|
||||
3. Facilitate informed dialogue between industry, policymakers, regulators,
|
||||
and the wider public.
|
||||
1. Aid the professionalization of the field and support nascent Trust and Safety teams as they build out their operations
|
||||
2. Support the adoption of agreed interpretations of critical terms use across the industry; and
|
||||
3. Facilitate informed dialogue between industry, policymakers, regulators and the wider public
|
||||
|
||||
The goal for this first edition has been to describe how key terms are used by
|
||||
practitioners in industry. These are not legal definitions, and their publication
|
||||
does not imply that every DTSP partner company fully agrees with every term
|
||||
as defined here.
|
||||
The goal for this first edition has been to describe how key terms are used by practitioners in industry. These are not legal definitions, and their publication does not imply that every DTSP partner company fully agrees with every term as defined here.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,36 +1,13 @@
|
|||
# Introduction
|
||||
As the Trust and Safety field grows — in significance, complexity, and
|
||||
number of practitioners — there is a corresponding value to ensuring a
|
||||
common understanding exists of key terms used by the people who work
|
||||
to keep users of digital services safe. Although companies have long used
|
||||
combinations of people, processes, and technology to address content- and
|
||||
conduct-related risks, this field, following the trajectory of other technology
|
||||
specializations like cybersecurity and privacy, has reached a critical point
|
||||
where it has begun to formalize, mature, and achieve self-awareness.
|
||||
Important discussions are happening all around the world, in homes, schools,
|
||||
businesses, and at all levels of government, about what Trust and Safety
|
||||
should look like to best serve societies and their evolving relationships to the
|
||||
internet. But meaningful discussion has at times been limited by the lack of a
|
||||
shared vocabulary.
|
||||
As the Trust and Safety field grows — in significance, complexity, and number of practitioners — there is a corresponding value to ensuring a common understanding exists of key terms used by the people who work to keep users of digital services safe.
|
||||
|
||||
Over the past year, the Digital Trust & Safety Partnership (DTSP) has been
|
||||
working to develop the first industry glossary of Trust and Safety terms.
|
||||
Following a public consultation, in which DTSP received valuable input from
|
||||
stakeholders including academic organizations, industry partners, regulators,
|
||||
and others from around the world, we are releasing the first edition of the
|
||||
glossary.
|
||||
Although companies have long use combinations of people, processes, and technology to address content- and conduct-related risks, this field, following the trajectory of other technology specializations like cybersecurity and privacy, has reached a critical point where it has begun to formalize, mature, and achieve self-awareness Important discussions are happening all around the world, in homes, schools businesses, and at all levels of government, about what Trust and Safet should look like to best serve societies and their evolving relationships to the internet. But meaningful discussion has at times been limited by the lack of shared vocabulary.
|
||||
|
||||
Led by DTSP co-founder Alex Feerst, this glossary has the following
|
||||
objectives:
|
||||
Over the past year, the Digital Trust & Safety Partnership (DTSP) has bee working to develop the first industry glossary of Trust and Safety terms Following a public consultation, in which DTSP received valuable input fro stakeholders including academic organizations, industry partners, regulators and others from around the world, we are releasing the first edition of th glossary
|
||||
Led by DTSP co-founder Alex Feerst, this glossary has the following objectives
|
||||
|
||||
1. Aid the professionalization of the field and support nascent Trust and
|
||||
Safety teams as they build out their operations;
|
||||
2. Support the adoption of agreed interpretations of critical terms used
|
||||
across the industry; and
|
||||
3. Facilitate informed dialogue between industry, policymakers, regulators,
|
||||
and the wider public.
|
||||
1. Aid the professionalization of the field and support nascent Trust and Safety teams as they build out their operations
|
||||
2. Support the adoption of agreed interpretations of critical terms use across the industry; and
|
||||
3. Facilitate informed dialogue between industry, policymakers, regulators and the wider public
|
||||
|
||||
The goal for this first edition has been to describe how key terms are used by
|
||||
practitioners in industry. These are not legal definitions, and their publication
|
||||
does not imply that every DTSP partner company fully agrees with every term
|
||||
as defined here.
|
||||
The goal for this first edition has been to describe how key terms are used by practitioners in industry. These are not legal definitions, and their publication does not imply that every DTSP partner company fully agrees with every term as defined here.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,36 +1,13 @@
|
|||
# Introduction
|
||||
As the Trust and Safety field grows — in significance, complexity, and
|
||||
number of practitioners — there is a corresponding value to ensuring a
|
||||
common understanding exists of key terms used by the people who work
|
||||
to keep users of digital services safe. Although companies have long used
|
||||
combinations of people, processes, and technology to address content- and
|
||||
conduct-related risks, this field, following the trajectory of other technology
|
||||
specializations like cybersecurity and privacy, has reached a critical point
|
||||
where it has begun to formalize, mature, and achieve self-awareness.
|
||||
Important discussions are happening all around the world, in homes, schools,
|
||||
businesses, and at all levels of government, about what Trust and Safety
|
||||
should look like to best serve societies and their evolving relationships to the
|
||||
internet. But meaningful discussion has at times been limited by the lack of a
|
||||
shared vocabulary.
|
||||
As the Trust and Safety field grows — in significance, complexity, and number of practitioners — there is a corresponding value to ensuring a common understanding exists of key terms used by the people who work to keep users of digital services safe.
|
||||
|
||||
Over the past year, the Digital Trust & Safety Partnership (DTSP) has been
|
||||
working to develop the first industry glossary of Trust and Safety terms.
|
||||
Following a public consultation, in which DTSP received valuable input from
|
||||
stakeholders including academic organizations, industry partners, regulators,
|
||||
and others from around the world, we are releasing the first edition of the
|
||||
glossary.
|
||||
Although companies have long use combinations of people, processes, and technology to address content- and conduct-related risks, this field, following the trajectory of other technology specializations like cybersecurity and privacy, has reached a critical point where it has begun to formalize, mature, and achieve self-awareness Important discussions are happening all around the world, in homes, schools businesses, and at all levels of government, about what Trust and Safet should look like to best serve societies and their evolving relationships to the internet. But meaningful discussion has at times been limited by the lack of shared vocabulary.
|
||||
|
||||
Led by DTSP co-founder Alex Feerst, this glossary has the following
|
||||
objectives:
|
||||
Over the past year, the Digital Trust & Safety Partnership (DTSP) has bee working to develop the first industry glossary of Trust and Safety terms Following a public consultation, in which DTSP received valuable input fro stakeholders including academic organizations, industry partners, regulators and others from around the world, we are releasing the first edition of th glossary
|
||||
Led by DTSP co-founder Alex Feerst, this glossary has the following objectives
|
||||
|
||||
1. Aid the professionalization of the field and support nascent Trust and
|
||||
Safety teams as they build out their operations;
|
||||
2. Support the adoption of agreed interpretations of critical terms used
|
||||
across the industry; and
|
||||
3. Facilitate informed dialogue between industry, policymakers, regulators,
|
||||
and the wider public.
|
||||
1. Aid the professionalization of the field and support nascent Trust and Safety teams as they build out their operations
|
||||
2. Support the adoption of agreed interpretations of critical terms use across the industry; and
|
||||
3. Facilitate informed dialogue between industry, policymakers, regulators and the wider public
|
||||
|
||||
The goal for this first edition has been to describe how key terms are used by
|
||||
practitioners in industry. These are not legal definitions, and their publication
|
||||
does not imply that every DTSP partner company fully agrees with every term
|
||||
as defined here.
|
||||
The goal for this first edition has been to describe how key terms are used by practitioners in industry. These are not legal definitions, and their publication does not imply that every DTSP partner company fully agrees with every term as defined here.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,36 +1,13 @@
|
|||
# Introduction
|
||||
As the Trust and Safety field grows — in significance, complexity, and
|
||||
number of practitioners — there is a corresponding value to ensuring a
|
||||
common understanding exists of key terms used by the people who work
|
||||
to keep users of digital services safe. Although companies have long used
|
||||
combinations of people, processes, and technology to address content- and
|
||||
conduct-related risks, this field, following the trajectory of other technology
|
||||
specializations like cybersecurity and privacy, has reached a critical point
|
||||
where it has begun to formalize, mature, and achieve self-awareness.
|
||||
Important discussions are happening all around the world, in homes, schools,
|
||||
businesses, and at all levels of government, about what Trust and Safety
|
||||
should look like to best serve societies and their evolving relationships to the
|
||||
internet. But meaningful discussion has at times been limited by the lack of a
|
||||
shared vocabulary.
|
||||
As the Trust and Safety field grows — in significance, complexity, and number of practitioners — there is a corresponding value to ensuring a common understanding exists of key terms used by the people who work to keep users of digital services safe.
|
||||
|
||||
Over the past year, the Digital Trust & Safety Partnership (DTSP) has been
|
||||
working to develop the first industry glossary of Trust and Safety terms.
|
||||
Following a public consultation, in which DTSP received valuable input from
|
||||
stakeholders including academic organizations, industry partners, regulators,
|
||||
and others from around the world, we are releasing the first edition of the
|
||||
glossary.
|
||||
Although companies have long use combinations of people, processes, and technology to address content- and conduct-related risks, this field, following the trajectory of other technology specializations like cybersecurity and privacy, has reached a critical point where it has begun to formalize, mature, and achieve self-awareness Important discussions are happening all around the world, in homes, schools businesses, and at all levels of government, about what Trust and Safet should look like to best serve societies and their evolving relationships to the internet. But meaningful discussion has at times been limited by the lack of shared vocabulary.
|
||||
|
||||
Led by DTSP co-founder Alex Feerst, this glossary has the following
|
||||
objectives:
|
||||
Over the past year, the Digital Trust & Safety Partnership (DTSP) has bee working to develop the first industry glossary of Trust and Safety terms Following a public consultation, in which DTSP received valuable input fro stakeholders including academic organizations, industry partners, regulators and others from around the world, we are releasing the first edition of th glossary
|
||||
Led by DTSP co-founder Alex Feerst, this glossary has the following objectives
|
||||
|
||||
1. Aid the professionalization of the field and support nascent Trust and
|
||||
Safety teams as they build out their operations;
|
||||
2. Support the adoption of agreed interpretations of critical terms used
|
||||
across the industry; and
|
||||
3. Facilitate informed dialogue between industry, policymakers, regulators,
|
||||
and the wider public.
|
||||
1. Aid the professionalization of the field and support nascent Trust and Safety teams as they build out their operations
|
||||
2. Support the adoption of agreed interpretations of critical terms use across the industry; and
|
||||
3. Facilitate informed dialogue between industry, policymakers, regulators and the wider public
|
||||
|
||||
The goal for this first edition has been to describe how key terms are used by
|
||||
practitioners in industry. These are not legal definitions, and their publication
|
||||
does not imply that every DTSP partner company fully agrees with every term
|
||||
as defined here.
|
||||
The goal for this first edition has been to describe how key terms are used by practitioners in industry. These are not legal definitions, and their publication does not imply that every DTSP partner company fully agrees with every term as defined here.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
|
|||
Aquisição de conta
|
||||
Account Takeover
|
||||
|
||||
O cenário em que um usuário não autorizado ganha acesso da conta de um usuário, que também pode ser conhecido como hacking, phishing ou comprar informações pessoais vazadas.
|
||||
O cenário em que um utilizador não autorizado obtém controle de uma conta de utilizador através de meios como hacking, ‘phishing’ ou compra de credenciais vazadas.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
|
|||
Falsificação de opinião
|
||||
Astroturfing
|
||||
|
||||
Atividade organizada com intenção de criar aparência enganosa de amplo apoio autêntico de base ou oposição para uma razão dita, ou uma organização, porém, na verdade, a atividade é motivada, fundida ou coordenada por um ou um pequeno número de fontes obscuras.
|
||||
Atividade organizada que visa criar a aparência enganosa de amplo e autêntico apoio ou oposição popular a uma determinada causa ou organização, quando a atividade é motivada, financiada ou coordenada por uma única ou um pequeno número de fontes obscuras.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -2,7 +2,9 @@ Introdução
|
|||
Com o crescimento da área de Confiança e Segurança — em significância, complexidade e
|
||||
número de praticantes — há um valor correspondente em assegurar que exista um
|
||||
entendimento comum de termos-chave usados pelas pessoas que trabalham
|
||||
para manter a segurança digital dos usuários. Apesar de as companhias usarem já há um longo tempo
|
||||
para manter a segurança digital dos usuários.
|
||||
|
||||
Apesar de as companhias usarem já há um longo tempo
|
||||
a combinação de pessoas, processos e tecnologia para abordar riscos relacionados a conteúdo e conduta,
|
||||
esta área, seguindo a trajetória de outras especializações tecnológicas
|
||||
como a cibersegurança e privacidade, alcançou a um ponto crítico
|
||||
|
|
@ -13,13 +15,11 @@ deve se parecer para melhor servir sociedades e suas crescentes relações com a
|
|||
internet. Porém, uma discussão significativa tem sido por vezes limitada por falta de um
|
||||
vocabulário compartilhado.
|
||||
|
||||
Durante o ano passado, a Digital Trust & Safety Partnership (DTSP) — Parceria de Confiança e Segurança Digital — tem
|
||||
trabalhado para desenvolver o primeiro glossário de termos de Confiança e Segurança.
|
||||
Durante o ano passado, a Digital Trust & Safety Partnership (DTSP) — Parceria de Confiança e Segurança Digital — tem trabalhado para desenvolver o primeiro glossário de termos de Confiança e Segurança.
|
||||
Seguindo uma consulta pública, em que a DTSP recebeu sugestões valiosas de
|
||||
partes interessadas, incluindo organizações acadêmicas, parceiros da indústria, reguladores
|
||||
e outros de todo o mundo, estamos publicando a primeira edição deste
|
||||
glossário.
|
||||
|
||||
Liderado pelo cofundador da DTSP, Alex Feerst, este glossário tem os seguintes
|
||||
objetivos:
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -31,6 +31,6 @@ pela indústria; e
|
|||
e o amplo público.
|
||||
|
||||
O objetivo para esta primeira edição foi o de descrever como termos-chave são usados por
|
||||
praticantes na indústria. Estas não são definições jurídicas e sua publicação
|
||||
praticantes na indústria. Estas não são definições jurídicas e sua publicação
|
||||
não implica que toda companhia parceira da DTSP concorde completamente com cada termo
|
||||
como definido aqui.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,36 +1,13 @@
|
|||
# Introduction
|
||||
As the Trust and Safety field grows — in significance, complexity, and
|
||||
number of practitioners — there is a corresponding value to ensuring a
|
||||
common understanding exists of key terms used by the people who work
|
||||
to keep users of digital services safe. Although companies have long used
|
||||
combinations of people, processes, and technology to address content- and
|
||||
conduct-related risks, this field, following the trajectory of other technology
|
||||
specializations like cybersecurity and privacy, has reached a critical point
|
||||
where it has begun to formalize, mature, and achieve self-awareness.
|
||||
Important discussions are happening all around the world, in homes, schools,
|
||||
businesses, and at all levels of government, about what Trust and Safety
|
||||
should look like to best serve societies and their evolving relationships to the
|
||||
internet. But meaningful discussion has at times been limited by the lack of a
|
||||
shared vocabulary.
|
||||
As the Trust and Safety field grows — in significance, complexity, and number of practitioners — there is a corresponding value to ensuring a common understanding exists of key terms used by the people who work to keep users of digital services safe.
|
||||
|
||||
Over the past year, the Digital Trust & Safety Partnership (DTSP) has been
|
||||
working to develop the first industry glossary of Trust and Safety terms.
|
||||
Following a public consultation, in which DTSP received valuable input from
|
||||
stakeholders including academic organizations, industry partners, regulators,
|
||||
and others from around the world, we are releasing the first edition of the
|
||||
glossary.
|
||||
Although companies have long use combinations of people, processes, and technology to address content- and conduct-related risks, this field, following the trajectory of other technology specializations like cybersecurity and privacy, has reached a critical point where it has begun to formalize, mature, and achieve self-awareness Important discussions are happening all around the world, in homes, schools businesses, and at all levels of government, about what Trust and Safet should look like to best serve societies and their evolving relationships to the internet. But meaningful discussion has at times been limited by the lack of shared vocabulary.
|
||||
|
||||
Led by DTSP co-founder Alex Feerst, this glossary has the following
|
||||
objectives:
|
||||
Over the past year, the Digital Trust & Safety Partnership (DTSP) has bee working to develop the first industry glossary of Trust and Safety terms Following a public consultation, in which DTSP received valuable input fro stakeholders including academic organizations, industry partners, regulators and others from around the world, we are releasing the first edition of th glossary
|
||||
Led by DTSP co-founder Alex Feerst, this glossary has the following objectives
|
||||
|
||||
1. Aid the professionalization of the field and support nascent Trust and
|
||||
Safety teams as they build out their operations;
|
||||
2. Support the adoption of agreed interpretations of critical terms used
|
||||
across the industry; and
|
||||
3. Facilitate informed dialogue between industry, policymakers, regulators,
|
||||
and the wider public.
|
||||
1. Aid the professionalization of the field and support nascent Trust and Safety teams as they build out their operations
|
||||
2. Support the adoption of agreed interpretations of critical terms use across the industry; and
|
||||
3. Facilitate informed dialogue between industry, policymakers, regulators and the wider public
|
||||
|
||||
The goal for this first edition has been to describe how key terms are used by
|
||||
practitioners in industry. These are not legal definitions, and their publication
|
||||
does not imply that every DTSP partner company fully agrees with every term
|
||||
as defined here.
|
||||
The goal for this first edition has been to describe how key terms are used by practitioners in industry. These are not legal definitions, and their publication does not imply that every DTSP partner company fully agrees with every term as defined here.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,36 +1,13 @@
|
|||
# Introduction
|
||||
As the Trust and Safety field grows — in significance, complexity, and
|
||||
number of practitioners — there is a corresponding value to ensuring a
|
||||
common understanding exists of key terms used by the people who work
|
||||
to keep users of digital services safe. Although companies have long used
|
||||
combinations of people, processes, and technology to address content- and
|
||||
conduct-related risks, this field, following the trajectory of other technology
|
||||
specializations like cybersecurity and privacy, has reached a critical point
|
||||
where it has begun to formalize, mature, and achieve self-awareness.
|
||||
Important discussions are happening all around the world, in homes, schools,
|
||||
businesses, and at all levels of government, about what Trust and Safety
|
||||
should look like to best serve societies and their evolving relationships to the
|
||||
internet. But meaningful discussion has at times been limited by the lack of a
|
||||
shared vocabulary.
|
||||
As the Trust and Safety field grows — in significance, complexity, and number of practitioners — there is a corresponding value to ensuring a common understanding exists of key terms used by the people who work to keep users of digital services safe.
|
||||
|
||||
Over the past year, the Digital Trust & Safety Partnership (DTSP) has been
|
||||
working to develop the first industry glossary of Trust and Safety terms.
|
||||
Following a public consultation, in which DTSP received valuable input from
|
||||
stakeholders including academic organizations, industry partners, regulators,
|
||||
and others from around the world, we are releasing the first edition of the
|
||||
glossary.
|
||||
Although companies have long use combinations of people, processes, and technology to address content- and conduct-related risks, this field, following the trajectory of other technology specializations like cybersecurity and privacy, has reached a critical point where it has begun to formalize, mature, and achieve self-awareness Important discussions are happening all around the world, in homes, schools businesses, and at all levels of government, about what Trust and Safet should look like to best serve societies and their evolving relationships to the internet. But meaningful discussion has at times been limited by the lack of shared vocabulary.
|
||||
|
||||
Led by DTSP co-founder Alex Feerst, this glossary has the following
|
||||
objectives:
|
||||
Over the past year, the Digital Trust & Safety Partnership (DTSP) has bee working to develop the first industry glossary of Trust and Safety terms Following a public consultation, in which DTSP received valuable input fro stakeholders including academic organizations, industry partners, regulators and others from around the world, we are releasing the first edition of th glossary
|
||||
Led by DTSP co-founder Alex Feerst, this glossary has the following objectives
|
||||
|
||||
1. Aid the professionalization of the field and support nascent Trust and
|
||||
Safety teams as they build out their operations;
|
||||
2. Support the adoption of agreed interpretations of critical terms used
|
||||
across the industry; and
|
||||
3. Facilitate informed dialogue between industry, policymakers, regulators,
|
||||
and the wider public.
|
||||
1. Aid the professionalization of the field and support nascent Trust and Safety teams as they build out their operations
|
||||
2. Support the adoption of agreed interpretations of critical terms use across the industry; and
|
||||
3. Facilitate informed dialogue between industry, policymakers, regulators and the wider public
|
||||
|
||||
The goal for this first edition has been to describe how key terms are used by
|
||||
practitioners in industry. These are not legal definitions, and their publication
|
||||
does not imply that every DTSP partner company fully agrees with every term
|
||||
as defined here.
|
||||
The goal for this first edition has been to describe how key terms are used by practitioners in industry. These are not legal definitions, and their publication does not imply that every DTSP partner company fully agrees with every term as defined here.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,36 +1,13 @@
|
|||
# Introduction
|
||||
As the Trust and Safety field grows — in significance, complexity, and
|
||||
number of practitioners — there is a corresponding value to ensuring a
|
||||
common understanding exists of key terms used by the people who work
|
||||
to keep users of digital services safe. Although companies have long used
|
||||
combinations of people, processes, and technology to address content- and
|
||||
conduct-related risks, this field, following the trajectory of other technology
|
||||
specializations like cybersecurity and privacy, has reached a critical point
|
||||
where it has begun to formalize, mature, and achieve self-awareness.
|
||||
Important discussions are happening all around the world, in homes, schools,
|
||||
businesses, and at all levels of government, about what Trust and Safety
|
||||
should look like to best serve societies and their evolving relationships to the
|
||||
internet. But meaningful discussion has at times been limited by the lack of a
|
||||
shared vocabulary.
|
||||
As the Trust and Safety field grows — in significance, complexity, and number of practitioners — there is a corresponding value to ensuring a common understanding exists of key terms used by the people who work to keep users of digital services safe.
|
||||
|
||||
Over the past year, the Digital Trust & Safety Partnership (DTSP) has been
|
||||
working to develop the first industry glossary of Trust and Safety terms.
|
||||
Following a public consultation, in which DTSP received valuable input from
|
||||
stakeholders including academic organizations, industry partners, regulators,
|
||||
and others from around the world, we are releasing the first edition of the
|
||||
glossary.
|
||||
Although companies have long use combinations of people, processes, and technology to address content- and conduct-related risks, this field, following the trajectory of other technology specializations like cybersecurity and privacy, has reached a critical point where it has begun to formalize, mature, and achieve self-awareness Important discussions are happening all around the world, in homes, schools businesses, and at all levels of government, about what Trust and Safet should look like to best serve societies and their evolving relationships to the internet. But meaningful discussion has at times been limited by the lack of shared vocabulary.
|
||||
|
||||
Led by DTSP co-founder Alex Feerst, this glossary has the following
|
||||
objectives:
|
||||
Over the past year, the Digital Trust & Safety Partnership (DTSP) has bee working to develop the first industry glossary of Trust and Safety terms Following a public consultation, in which DTSP received valuable input fro stakeholders including academic organizations, industry partners, regulators and others from around the world, we are releasing the first edition of th glossary
|
||||
Led by DTSP co-founder Alex Feerst, this glossary has the following objectives
|
||||
|
||||
1. Aid the professionalization of the field and support nascent Trust and
|
||||
Safety teams as they build out their operations;
|
||||
2. Support the adoption of agreed interpretations of critical terms used
|
||||
across the industry; and
|
||||
3. Facilitate informed dialogue between industry, policymakers, regulators,
|
||||
and the wider public.
|
||||
1. Aid the professionalization of the field and support nascent Trust and Safety teams as they build out their operations
|
||||
2. Support the adoption of agreed interpretations of critical terms use across the industry; and
|
||||
3. Facilitate informed dialogue between industry, policymakers, regulators and the wider public
|
||||
|
||||
The goal for this first edition has been to describe how key terms are used by
|
||||
practitioners in industry. These are not legal definitions, and their publication
|
||||
does not imply that every DTSP partner company fully agrees with every term
|
||||
as defined here.
|
||||
The goal for this first edition has been to describe how key terms are used by practitioners in industry. These are not legal definitions, and their publication does not imply that every DTSP partner company fully agrees with every term as defined here.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,36 +1,13 @@
|
|||
# Introduction
|
||||
As the Trust and Safety field grows — in significance, complexity, and
|
||||
number of practitioners — there is a corresponding value to ensuring a
|
||||
common understanding exists of key terms used by the people who work
|
||||
to keep users of digital services safe. Although companies have long used
|
||||
combinations of people, processes, and technology to address content- and
|
||||
conduct-related risks, this field, following the trajectory of other technology
|
||||
specializations like cybersecurity and privacy, has reached a critical point
|
||||
where it has begun to formalize, mature, and achieve self-awareness.
|
||||
Important discussions are happening all around the world, in homes, schools,
|
||||
businesses, and at all levels of government, about what Trust and Safety
|
||||
should look like to best serve societies and their evolving relationships to the
|
||||
internet. But meaningful discussion has at times been limited by the lack of a
|
||||
shared vocabulary.
|
||||
As the Trust and Safety field grows — in significance, complexity, and number of practitioners — there is a corresponding value to ensuring a common understanding exists of key terms used by the people who work to keep users of digital services safe.
|
||||
|
||||
Over the past year, the Digital Trust & Safety Partnership (DTSP) has been
|
||||
working to develop the first industry glossary of Trust and Safety terms.
|
||||
Following a public consultation, in which DTSP received valuable input from
|
||||
stakeholders including academic organizations, industry partners, regulators,
|
||||
and others from around the world, we are releasing the first edition of the
|
||||
glossary.
|
||||
Although companies have long use combinations of people, processes, and technology to address content- and conduct-related risks, this field, following the trajectory of other technology specializations like cybersecurity and privacy, has reached a critical point where it has begun to formalize, mature, and achieve self-awareness Important discussions are happening all around the world, in homes, schools businesses, and at all levels of government, about what Trust and Safet should look like to best serve societies and their evolving relationships to the internet. But meaningful discussion has at times been limited by the lack of shared vocabulary.
|
||||
|
||||
Led by DTSP co-founder Alex Feerst, this glossary has the following
|
||||
objectives:
|
||||
Over the past year, the Digital Trust & Safety Partnership (DTSP) has bee working to develop the first industry glossary of Trust and Safety terms Following a public consultation, in which DTSP received valuable input fro stakeholders including academic organizations, industry partners, regulators and others from around the world, we are releasing the first edition of th glossary
|
||||
Led by DTSP co-founder Alex Feerst, this glossary has the following objectives
|
||||
|
||||
1. Aid the professionalization of the field and support nascent Trust and
|
||||
Safety teams as they build out their operations;
|
||||
2. Support the adoption of agreed interpretations of critical terms used
|
||||
across the industry; and
|
||||
3. Facilitate informed dialogue between industry, policymakers, regulators,
|
||||
and the wider public.
|
||||
1. Aid the professionalization of the field and support nascent Trust and Safety teams as they build out their operations
|
||||
2. Support the adoption of agreed interpretations of critical terms use across the industry; and
|
||||
3. Facilitate informed dialogue between industry, policymakers, regulators and the wider public
|
||||
|
||||
The goal for this first edition has been to describe how key terms are used by
|
||||
practitioners in industry. These are not legal definitions, and their publication
|
||||
does not imply that every DTSP partner company fully agrees with every term
|
||||
as defined here.
|
||||
The goal for this first edition has been to describe how key terms are used by practitioners in industry. These are not legal definitions, and their publication does not imply that every DTSP partner company fully agrees with every term as defined here.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,36 +1,13 @@
|
|||
# Introduction
|
||||
As the Trust and Safety field grows — in significance, complexity, and
|
||||
number of practitioners — there is a corresponding value to ensuring a
|
||||
common understanding exists of key terms used by the people who work
|
||||
to keep users of digital services safe. Although companies have long used
|
||||
combinations of people, processes, and technology to address content- and
|
||||
conduct-related risks, this field, following the trajectory of other technology
|
||||
specializations like cybersecurity and privacy, has reached a critical point
|
||||
where it has begun to formalize, mature, and achieve self-awareness.
|
||||
Important discussions are happening all around the world, in homes, schools,
|
||||
businesses, and at all levels of government, about what Trust and Safety
|
||||
should look like to best serve societies and their evolving relationships to the
|
||||
internet. But meaningful discussion has at times been limited by the lack of a
|
||||
shared vocabulary.
|
||||
As the Trust and Safety field grows — in significance, complexity, and number of practitioners — there is a corresponding value to ensuring a common understanding exists of key terms used by the people who work to keep users of digital services safe.
|
||||
|
||||
Over the past year, the Digital Trust & Safety Partnership (DTSP) has been
|
||||
working to develop the first industry glossary of Trust and Safety terms.
|
||||
Following a public consultation, in which DTSP received valuable input from
|
||||
stakeholders including academic organizations, industry partners, regulators,
|
||||
and others from around the world, we are releasing the first edition of the
|
||||
glossary.
|
||||
Although companies have long use combinations of people, processes, and technology to address content- and conduct-related risks, this field, following the trajectory of other technology specializations like cybersecurity and privacy, has reached a critical point where it has begun to formalize, mature, and achieve self-awareness Important discussions are happening all around the world, in homes, schools businesses, and at all levels of government, about what Trust and Safet should look like to best serve societies and their evolving relationships to the internet. But meaningful discussion has at times been limited by the lack of shared vocabulary.
|
||||
|
||||
Led by DTSP co-founder Alex Feerst, this glossary has the following
|
||||
objectives:
|
||||
Over the past year, the Digital Trust & Safety Partnership (DTSP) has bee working to develop the first industry glossary of Trust and Safety terms Following a public consultation, in which DTSP received valuable input fro stakeholders including academic organizations, industry partners, regulators and others from around the world, we are releasing the first edition of th glossary
|
||||
Led by DTSP co-founder Alex Feerst, this glossary has the following objectives
|
||||
|
||||
1. Aid the professionalization of the field and support nascent Trust and
|
||||
Safety teams as they build out their operations;
|
||||
2. Support the adoption of agreed interpretations of critical terms used
|
||||
across the industry; and
|
||||
3. Facilitate informed dialogue between industry, policymakers, regulators,
|
||||
and the wider public.
|
||||
1. Aid the professionalization of the field and support nascent Trust and Safety teams as they build out their operations
|
||||
2. Support the adoption of agreed interpretations of critical terms use across the industry; and
|
||||
3. Facilitate informed dialogue between industry, policymakers, regulators and the wider public
|
||||
|
||||
The goal for this first edition has been to describe how key terms are used by
|
||||
practitioners in industry. These are not legal definitions, and their publication
|
||||
does not imply that every DTSP partner company fully agrees with every term
|
||||
as defined here.
|
||||
The goal for this first edition has been to describe how key terms are used by practitioners in industry. These are not legal definitions, and their publication does not imply that every DTSP partner company fully agrees with every term as defined here.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,36 +1,13 @@
|
|||
# Introduction
|
||||
As the Trust and Safety field grows — in significance, complexity, and
|
||||
number of practitioners — there is a corresponding value to ensuring a
|
||||
common understanding exists of key terms used by the people who work
|
||||
to keep users of digital services safe. Although companies have long used
|
||||
combinations of people, processes, and technology to address content- and
|
||||
conduct-related risks, this field, following the trajectory of other technology
|
||||
specializations like cybersecurity and privacy, has reached a critical point
|
||||
where it has begun to formalize, mature, and achieve self-awareness.
|
||||
Important discussions are happening all around the world, in homes, schools,
|
||||
businesses, and at all levels of government, about what Trust and Safety
|
||||
should look like to best serve societies and their evolving relationships to the
|
||||
internet. But meaningful discussion has at times been limited by the lack of a
|
||||
shared vocabulary.
|
||||
As the Trust and Safety field grows — in significance, complexity, and number of practitioners — there is a corresponding value to ensuring a common understanding exists of key terms used by the people who work to keep users of digital services safe.
|
||||
|
||||
Over the past year, the Digital Trust & Safety Partnership (DTSP) has been
|
||||
working to develop the first industry glossary of Trust and Safety terms.
|
||||
Following a public consultation, in which DTSP received valuable input from
|
||||
stakeholders including academic organizations, industry partners, regulators,
|
||||
and others from around the world, we are releasing the first edition of the
|
||||
glossary.
|
||||
Although companies have long use combinations of people, processes, and technology to address content- and conduct-related risks, this field, following the trajectory of other technology specializations like cybersecurity and privacy, has reached a critical point where it has begun to formalize, mature, and achieve self-awareness Important discussions are happening all around the world, in homes, schools businesses, and at all levels of government, about what Trust and Safet should look like to best serve societies and their evolving relationships to the internet. But meaningful discussion has at times been limited by the lack of shared vocabulary.
|
||||
|
||||
Led by DTSP co-founder Alex Feerst, this glossary has the following
|
||||
objectives:
|
||||
Over the past year, the Digital Trust & Safety Partnership (DTSP) has bee working to develop the first industry glossary of Trust and Safety terms Following a public consultation, in which DTSP received valuable input fro stakeholders including academic organizations, industry partners, regulators and others from around the world, we are releasing the first edition of th glossary
|
||||
Led by DTSP co-founder Alex Feerst, this glossary has the following objectives
|
||||
|
||||
1. Aid the professionalization of the field and support nascent Trust and
|
||||
Safety teams as they build out their operations;
|
||||
2. Support the adoption of agreed interpretations of critical terms used
|
||||
across the industry; and
|
||||
3. Facilitate informed dialogue between industry, policymakers, regulators,
|
||||
and the wider public.
|
||||
1. Aid the professionalization of the field and support nascent Trust and Safety teams as they build out their operations
|
||||
2. Support the adoption of agreed interpretations of critical terms use across the industry; and
|
||||
3. Facilitate informed dialogue between industry, policymakers, regulators and the wider public
|
||||
|
||||
The goal for this first edition has been to describe how key terms are used by
|
||||
practitioners in industry. These are not legal definitions, and their publication
|
||||
does not imply that every DTSP partner company fully agrees with every term
|
||||
as defined here.
|
||||
The goal for this first edition has been to describe how key terms are used by practitioners in industry. These are not legal definitions, and their publication does not imply that every DTSP partner company fully agrees with every term as defined here.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue